EVALUATION OF BINDER COMPATIBILITY IN OPTIMISED PALM KERNEL SHELL-COAL BLENDS FOR ASH REDUCTION AND ENERGY OPTIMISATION SUSTAINABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23055746Keywords:
Agricultural waste, Ash reduction, Binder optimization, Cleaner energy, Palm kernel shell, StyrofoamAbstract
This study investigated the effects of three locally sourced binders—cassava starch (CST), wastepaper (WP), and Styrofoam (SF)—on the synergistic combustion of palm kernel shell (PKS) and coal pellets for ash reduction and energy optimisation. Pellets were produced at two blend ratios (10% PKS:90% coal and 20% PKS:80% coal) with a constant binder composition of 30%. The samples were characterised using bomb calorimetry for calorific value, proximate analysis for moisture, volatile matter, ash, and fixed carbon content, and X-ray fluorescence for ultimate analysis (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulphur, and oxygen). The control samples (binderless) exhibited the highest calorific values (19.98–21.06 MJ/kg), while binder-enhanced pellets showed lower values (12.07-18.11 MJ/kg). Proximate analysis revealed that binder addition significantly reduced ash content, with cassava starch achieving the greatest reduction of 46% (from 19.72% to 10.59%) in 20% PKS blends, and wastepaper demonstrating the lowest ash content (11.95%) in 10% PKS blends. Ultimate analysis showed that the addition of wastepaper elevated the carbon content to 70.28% in 20% PKS blends, while cassava starch optimised the balance between fixed carbon (43.70%) and volatile matter (43.96%). Sulphur content increased with binder addition, particularly with wastepaper (1.00%), highlighting trade-offs in emissions. The 20% PKS blend with a cassava starch binder emerged as the optimal formulation, achieving substantial ash reduction, an acceptable calorific value (17.00 MJ/kg), and promising emission-reduction potential. This research demonstrates that binder selection critically influences fuel properties and provides validation parameters for developing sustainable binder-enhanced PKS-coal pellets as a cleaner energy alternative for co-firing applications.
Downloads
References
Adeleke, A. A., Petrus, N., Ayuba, S., Yahya, A. M., Ikubanni, P. P., Okafor, I. S., Emmanuel, S. S., Olosho, A. I., & Adesibikan, A. A. (2023). Nigerian biomass for bioenergy applications: A review on the potential and challenges. Journal of Renewable Materials, 11(12), 4123–4141.
Ahmad, R. K., Sulaiman, S. A., Yusup, S., Dol, S. S., Inayat, M., & Umar, H. A. (2022). Exploring the potential of coconut shell biomass for charcoal production. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(1), 101499.
Al-Qayim, K., Nimmo, W., Hughes, K. J., & Pourkashanian, M. (2019). Effect of oxy-fuel combustion on ash deposition of pulverized wood pellets. Biofuel Research Journal, 21, 927–936.
Anguruwa, G. T., Yaduma, Z. B., Odega, C. A., Fatade, B. O., Ademola, T., & Omidiran, M. O. (2024). Characterization of briquette derived from three wood residues using starch as binder. Journal of Forestry Research and Management, 21(2), 126–139.
Baxter, L. (2005). Biomass-coal co-combustion: Opportunity for affordable renewable energy. Fuel, 84, 1295–1302.
Chen, W. H., Peng, J., & Bi, X. T. (2015). A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 847–866.
Erokare, E. T., Umunna, M. F., Efe, J. I., Nyorere, O., Iweka, S. C., Okoh, P. C., & Ikoko, O. (2025). Suitability of cassava starch and waste paper binders for biomass pellets: A review study. Nigerian Journal of Engineering Technology and Science Education.
Erokare, ET; Ekpu, M; Sinebe, JE; Sada, SO; Ikpeseni, SC; Atsu, AM (2026). A critical review on the impacts of binder on pellet quality, combustion performance and pollutant emissions in biomass-coal co-fired pellets. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 30(5), 1663–1673.
Erokare, ET; Ekpu, M; Sinebe, JE; Sada, SO; Ikpeseni, SC; Atsu, AM (2026). Combustion performance and emission characteristics of sawdust-coal pellets using waste styrofoam as binder. Journal of Science Innovation & Technology Research (JSITR). https://doi.org/10.70382/ajsitr.v12i9.072
Erol, M., Haykiri-Acma, H., & Küçükbayrak, S. (2010). Calorific value estimation of biomass from their proximate analyses data. Renewable Energy, 35(1), 170–173.
Fernando, R. (2012). Co-firing high ratios of biomass with coal (CCC/194). International Centre for Sustainable Carbon. Retrieved from https://www.sustainable-carbon.org/report/cofiring-high-ratios-of-biomass-with-coal-ccc-194/
Guo, X., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. (2023). Synergistic ash reduction and emission control in coal-biomass blends using polymer additives. Fuel, 352, 129104.
Ighodaro, O. O., & Ndem, F. E. (2023). Performance modelling of co-fired palm kernel shell pulverized coal blend in a steam power plant. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 27(5), 899–903.
International Energy Agency. (2025). World Energy Outlook 2025. Paris: IEA.
International Renewable Energy Agency. (2024). Global Energy Transformation: A Pathway to 2030. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.
Sinebe, J. E., Erokare, E., Ulakpa, W. C., Bereprebofa, D., & Enyi, C. L. (2026). Comparative evaluation of fuel properties and energy potential of pellets produced from diverse agricultural biomass wastes in tropical regions: Implications for sustainable bioenergy production. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 10(10), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2026-1010-5460
Sinebe, J. E., Erokare, E. T., Ulakpa, W. C., Bereprebofa, D., & Enyi, C. L. (2026). Comparative emission potential assessment of coconut shell–coal pellets using ultimate analysis for sustainable co-firing applications. Umudike Journal of Engineering and Technology, 12(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.33922/j.ujet_v12i3_3
Sinebe, J. E., Erokare, E. T., Ulakpa, W. C., Bereprebofa, D., & Enyi, C. L. (2026). Effect of optimization ratios on proximate and ultimate compositions and heating values of palm kernel shell and groundnut shell co-fired pellets bound with wastepaper. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 30(8), 2470–2479. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v30i8.6
Kolo, Z. K., Musa, M. A., & Jones, A. N. (2024). Effect of binders on the performance of charcoal briquettes produced from selected biomass. Arid Zone Journal of Engineering Technology and Environment, 20(1), 1–10.
Kuswa, F. M., Putra, H. P., Prabowo, Guntur, H. L., Ghazidin, H., Darmawan, A., Ali Nandar, C. S., Aziz, M., Ding, L., & Hariana, H. (2025). Evaluation for the combination of oil palm biomass as co-firing fuel: Investigation into ash-related problems. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 15, 10537–10551.
Lomunyak, G., Osodo, B., Njoka, F., & Kombe, E. (2024). Characterization, optimization, and emission analysis of manually-made charcoal dust briquettes with starch, paper, and algae binders. Heliyon, 10(24), e40991.
Nainggolan, I. F., Hadiyanto, & Utomo, M. S. K. T. (2023). Performance analysis of co-firing using palm kernel shells in a chain grate stoker coal-fired power plant 2 × 7 MW. Briliant, 8(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v8i2.1349
Okafor, C., Nzekwe, C., Ajaero, C., Ibekwe, J., Otunomo, F., Charles, C., Juliet, C., & Festus, A. (2022). Biomass utilization for energy production in Nigeria: A review. Clean Energy Systems, 3, 100043.
Olugbade, T., Ojo, O., & Mohammed, T. (2019). Influence of binders on combustion properties of biomass briquettes: A recent review. BioEnergy Research, 12, 51–68.
Orhorhoro, E. K., Oyejide, J. O., & Erokare, T. E. (2023). Optimization of biogas yield by the combination of algal biomass and food waste. NIPES Proceedings in Science & Technology, 2(3), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.37933/nipesproc/3.2.2023.44
Onochie, U. P., Obanor, A. I., Aliu, S. A., & Igbodaro, O. O. (2017). Proximate and ultimate analysis of fuel pellets from oil palm residues. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 36(3), 987–990.
Onochie, U. P., Otomi, K. O., Owamah, H. I., Ikpeseni, S. C., & Adingwupu, A. C. (2022). Assessment of power generation potential from the co-firing of Elaeis Guineensis residues with coal pellets in a popular Nigerian palm oil research institute. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 42(9), 2804–2819.
Onochie, U. P., Ofomatah, A. C., Owamah, H. I., Ikpeseni, S. C., Onwusa, S. C., Erokare, T. E., & Orugba, H. O. (2024). Assessment of the compatibility of biomass-coal blends for cleaner energy utilization and sustainable development. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05771-3
Onochie, U. P., Ekanem, D. O., Onoroh, F., Osigbemeh, M. S., Owamah, H. I., Orugba, H. O., Ikpeseni, S. C., Okolotu, G. I., Oyebisi, S., & Kwasi-Effah, C. C. (2025). Palm kernel shell and coconut shell pellets cofiring: Effect of optimization ratio on the combustion emission CO₂ and SO₂. NIPES Journal of Science and Technology Research, 7(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.37933/nipes/7.2.2025.6
Peng, J. H., Bi, X. T., Sokhansanj, S., & Lim, C. J. (2013). Torrefaction and densification of different species of softwood residues. Fuel, 111, 411–421.
Pradhan, P., Mahajani, S. M., & Arora, A. (2018). Production and utilization of fuel pellets from biomass: A review. Fuel Processing Technology, 181, 215–232.
Sarker, P. R., Borugadda, V. B., Meda, V., & Dalai, A. K. (2023). Optimization of pelletization process conditions and binder concentration for production of fuel pellets from oat hull and quality evaluation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 174, 106825.
Song, B., & Hall, P. (2020). Densification of biomass and waste plastic blends as a solid fuel: Hazards, advantages, and perspectives. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, 58.
Trivedi, K., Sharma, A., Kanabar, B. K., Arunachalam, K. D., & Gautam, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of coal and biomass for sustainable energy production: Elemental composition, combustion behavior, and co-firing potential. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07509-3
Umubigho, W., Ekpu, M., Sada, S. O., Sinebe, J. E., & Ikpeseni, S. C. (2025). Characterising emissions from sawdust-coal pellets combustion using ultimate analysis techniques. NIPES Journal of Science and Technology Research, 7(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.37933/nipes/7.1.2025.6
Umubigho, W., Sinebe, J. E., Erokare, E. T., & Ulakpa, W. C. (2026). Experimental investigation of the thermal performance of coal–sawdust fuel pellets with varying biomass ratios. Journal of African Innovation & Advanced Studies, 12(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.70382/ajaias.v12i2.082
United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Emissions Gap Report 2024. Nairobi: UNEP.
Vamvuka, D., Pasadakis, N., Kastanaki, E., Grammelis, P., & Kakaras, E. (2003). Kinetic modeling of coal/agricultural by-product blends. Energy & Fuels, 17(3), 549–558.
Wang, Z., Zhai, Y., Wang, T., Wang, B., Peng, C., & Li, C. (2020). Pelletizing of hydrochar biofuels with organic binders. Fuel, 280, 118659.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118659Get rights and content
World Bank. (2024). Energy Sector Directions Paper: 2024 Update. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yaka, H., Insel, M. A., Yucel, O., & Sadikoglu, H. (2022). A comparison of machine learning algorithms for the estimation of higher heating values of biomass and fossil fuels from ultimate analysis. Fuel, 320, 123971.
Zhang, Y.-L., Kang, J.-N., Dai, M., Hou, J.-J., Liu, L.-C., Wei, Y.-M., & Liao, H. (2023). The role of BECCS technology in achieving carbon neutrality: Evidence from China's coal power sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03842-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted paper becomes the permanent property of the International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment (IJREE) and may not be reproduced by any means without the written permission of the Editorial board.
